GD/97

Japan - Measures on Imports of Thrown Silk Yarn

Other titles

Japan Silk Yarn (Source: GATT Analytical Index)

Parties

Complainant
Respondent
Third Parties

Products at Issue

Products at issue
Silk yarn
Type of product
Non-agricultural
Product sub-type
Textiles and Apparel

Related disputes

GATT
WTO

Key legal aspects

Legal basis
  • n.a.
Claims raised
  • GATT Article I
  • GATT Article XI
  • GATT Article XIII
  • GATT Article XV
Defences raised
  • GATT Article XVII

Adjudicators

Type Panel
Chairperson Mr. Ekblom (Finland)
Other members Mr. Hall (Australia), Nimal L. Breckenridge (Sri Lanka)

Report

Type Panel
Legal basis at issue
  • n.a.
Claims at issue
  • GATT Article I
  • GATT Article XI
  • GATT Article XIII
  • GATT Article XV
Defences at issue
  • GATT Article XVII
No of Pages (total / legal reasoning) 2
  • -
  • No finding in light of mutually agreed solution
  • No finding in light of mutually agreed solution
  • No finding in light of mutually agreed solution
  • No finding in light of mutually agreed solution
  • No finding in light of mutually agreed solution

Timeline

Request for consultations
  • (01/07/1976)
Request for establishment
Establishment
Composition
Report
Adoption of report
Mutually agreed solution
  • (15/02/1978)

Outcome

Outcome of the proceedings
Report adopted, mutually agreed solution
Additional Info L/4637 (03/03/1978) Japanese Measures on Imports of Thrown Silk Yarn - Report of the Panel : The matter referred to by the United States concerned Japan's measures on imports of thrown silk. On 13 December 1977 the Panel presented its findings orally to the parties and invited them to inform the Panel by the end of the year whether they thought it possible to arrive at an agreement on the basis of bilateral consultations. An affirmative indication to this effect was given within the specified time-limit. On 15 February 1978 the Panel was informed that the bilateral consultations between the US and Japan had been brought to a successful conclusion and that the Government of the US was satisfied with the way in which the Government of Japan would implement the prior permission system on thrown silk yarn.

Note: The Report of the Panel (L/4637) reported a mutually agreed solution.