GD/107
Japan's Measures on Imports of Leather
Other titles
Japan Leather (Canada) (Source: GATT Analytical Index)
Products at Issue
Products at issue |
Leather
|
Type of product |
Non-agricultural
|
Product sub-type |
Leather and footwear
|
Related disputes
GATT | |
WTO |
Key legal aspects
Legal basis |
|
Claims raised |
|
Defences raised |
|
Adjudicators
Type | Panel |
Chairperson | H. Ewerlöf (Sweden) |
Other members | Mr. Ostenfeld (Denmark), Mr. Furulyas (Hungary) |
Type | Panel |
Legal basis at issue |
|
Claims at issue |
|
Defences at issue |
|
No of Pages (total / legal reasoning) | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Timeline
Request for consultations |
|
Request for establishment | |
Establishment | |
Composition | |
Report | |
Adoption of report | |
Mutually agreed solution |
|
Request withdrawn |
|
Outcome
Outcome of the proceedings |
Withdrawal or modification of measure, report adopted, mutually agreed solution, request withdrawn
|
Additional Info | L/5042 (20/10/1980) Japan's Measures on Imports of Leather - Report of the Panel: The Panel examined the compatibility with the General Agreement of Japanese restrictions on imports of leather. In a joint communication dated 6 October 1980 the parties advised that they had now successfully concluded their bilateral consultations and had signed a Record of Discussions on 22 September 1980 containing a solution to the dispute and a statement that Canada would be withdrawing the complaint filed under Article XXIII:2. "In view of the fact that the agreement reached between Canada and Japan constitutes a solution to the matter before it, the Panel considers the proceedings under Article XXIII:2 to be terminated." SCM/W/48 (11/05/1983) Negotiating History of Article 18.9 and the Treatment of Reports of Working Parties and Panels under Article XXIII of the General Agreement - SCM Committee - Factual Note by the Secretariat: Reported as an Article XXIII complaint. "Council report adopted on 10 November 1980 notes that Canada and Japan agreed on a solution to the matter." Note: The Report of the Panel (L/5042) reported a mutually agreed solution. |